Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening from Kathmandu. This is Issue 153 of Kalam Weekly, the only newsletter you need to keep up-to-date with everything that is happening in Nepal. This week, we have a guest post by my friend Marissa Taylor. She is a seasoned journalist and has written much about climate change and the environment, among other issues. In today’s deep dive, she tackles the continuing wholesale destruction of Nepal’s Chure landscape.
Before we begin, a big shoutout to my newest paid subscribers — Deepesh Poudel, Izabella Koziell, and Angela Nawang. Thank you so much for your support. I can’t do this without you. If any other readers wish to support me, you can click the link below.
In this newsletter:
Glacial Lake Outburst Flood in Thame
Foreign Minister Arzu Rana Deuba goes to India
Nepal lifts ban on TikTok
Nepali nurse goes missing in the US, husband arrested
The deep dive: Crisis in the Chure
Glacial Lake Outburst Flood in Thame
Last Friday, just as this newsletter was about to go out, reports emerged that a flood of ice and water had hit the village of Thame in Solukhumbu District. Thame is a small but notable village, home to many of mountaineering’s most accomplished climbers, including Tenzing Norgay and Everest record holders Kami Rita Sherpa and Apa Sherpa. The flood was believed to have been caused by a glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF), perhaps triggered by an earthquake across the border in Xizang on the Tibetan Plateau. Thankfully, no lives were lost as children were away at school, and residents had enough time to retreat to higher ground. Over a dozen buildings and homes, however, were destroyed.
Although it has yet to be ascertained whether climate change contributed to the GLOF, the flood has brought national and international attention to the grave risk many mountain communities face. Glacial lakes are fed by snow melt from nearby glaciers, and as temperatures rise, these lakes grow larger, threatening to overflow their banks and flood communities downstream. Tsho Rolpa, one of the biggest glacial lakes, has grown significantly in the last 60 years, expanding to over 1.65 square kilometers. Imja Tsho, formed by glacier melt at the foot of the Imja Glacier in the Everest region, is the fastest-growing glacial lake in the Himalayan Hindu Kush region. These are the only two glacial lakes that have seen any mitigation and monitoring measures when 20 other lakes pose a similar risk. According to a Dialogue Earth report, even these mitigation measures have been abandoned after minimizing the immediate risk while the monitoring and early warning systems are defunct.
The risk of GLOFs and floods triggered by debris flows grows every year. Even small lakes—thousands across the country—can cause massive damage to downstream communities and infrastructure when they flood. Glaciologist Tenzing Chogyal Sherpa points out in this excellent report by Sonia Awale in Nepali Times, “As glaciers melt and lakes expand, disasters like Thame will be more frequent, we have to adapt. We need to tell our stories to the world, even as they continue to debate on the topic, we are already facing the brunt of it without having caused it ourselves. At local levels, we have to get back on our feet and prepare for what's coming.”
Foreign Minister Arzu Rana Deuba goes to India
Foreign Minister Arzu Rana Deuba is now back in Kathmandu after wrapping up a whirlwind two-day visit to India. In Delhi, she met with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Foreign Minister S Jaishankar, and her rakhi-bhai Vijay Chauthaiwale, Foreign Department Chief of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Tellingly, Dr Rana Deuba did not meet anyone from the opposition, not even the Indian National Congress, which traditionally shared very close ties with the Nepali Congress. The meetings were more symbolic than anything, a testament to the Nepali Congress and Foreign Minister Rana Deuba’s clout in Delhi. The Nepali Congress has traditionally had closer relations with India than Nepal’s other more left parties like the UML and the Maoists. Madam Foreign Minister herself has close personal ties with high-ranking BJP functionaries like Chauthaiwale. It is pretty rare for Prime Minister Modi to meet with a Nepali foreign minister on their first trip to India. Last year, Nepal’s ambassador to India, Shankar Sharma, spent months angling for a meeting with Jaishankar and Modi.
Perhaps the Modi administration is reaffirming its ‘neighborhood first’ policy after its less-than-stellar win in the recent elections, or maybe it is more about personality than policy. Whatever the reason for Rana Deuba's welcome in Delhi, it is certainly to Nepal’s advantage to have a foreign minister who is welcome in one of Nepal’s most consequential neighbors. The visit was more of a courtesy call, so no agreements were signed, but India took the occasion to announce that it would be importing another 251MW of electricity from Nepal. Of course, this electricity cannot come from hydropower plants built by the Chinese or with Chinese investment, an Indian precondition that really does not benefit Nepal.
However, seeing more women on the Nepal team was refreshing. Foreign Minister Rana Deuba was accompanied by Durapada Sapkota, Minister Counsellor at the Nepali Embassy in India. With Rana Deuba in charge of the ministry and Sewa Lamsal as the foreign secretary, let’s hope to see fewer all-male diplomatic teams in the future.
Nepal lifts ban on TikTok
On Thursday, August 22, the KP Sharma Oli Cabinet lifted the ban on TikTok. The Chinese social media application was banned last November by the Pushpa Kamal Dahal administration, citing “disruption to social harmony”. Announcing the lifting of the ban, Minister for Communication and Information Technology Prithvi Subba Gurung, who is also the government spokesperson, said that no social media applications would be allowed to disrupt social harmony and that TikTok would have to abide by certain conditions imposed by the Nepal government within three months. TikTok will now be required to “help promote Nepal's tourism; invest in digital literacy efforts; support to uplift Nepal's public education system; and be mindful of the language used on its platform,” The Kathmandu Post quoted Gurung as saying. There’s little clarity on what these conditions actually entail, but ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, has reportedly agreed to abide by them.
The lifting of the ban will no doubt bring much joy to Nepalis, who had taken to the app with passion. Many young Nepalis even monetized their social media presence. However, TikTok was also heavily criticized for spreading all kinds of misinformation. The authorities were wary of TikTok but had resisted taking any action lest they anger the Chinese. It was only when failed businessperson Durga Prasai rallied massive crowds for a rally to bring back Hinduism to the country that the Dahal government decided it had had enough and banned the app.
There were other more nefarious motives behind the banning of TikTok, though. The mainstream media, particularly Kantipur, had openly called for a ban on TikTok as the app started eating into their viewership. The TV-watching and newspaper-reading audience switched to TikTok for their news, which wasn’t palatable to the legacy media. Of course, this is not to say that TikTok was not an offender when it came to spreading misinformation. Its sleek algorithm meant that fake and misleading information spread faster than ever before. Instead of demanding reforms and educating the public, the media demanded a ban, and the government was happy to comply. Read more about the reasons behind the TikTok ban in this previous newsletter:
Nepali nurse goes missing in the US, husband arrested
The Nepali community in the United States has been beside itself with concern for 28-year-old nurse Mamta Kafle Bhatt, who has been missing for nearly a month now. Bhatt, a new mother and nurse in the city of Manassas Park in the American state of Virginia, went missing on July 28. When she didn’t show up to work at the UVA Prince William Medical Center, her co-workers, on August 2, asked the police to conduct a wellness check. Mamta’s family, who live in Nepal, had not heard from her since July 29. Police questioned her husband, Naresh Bhatt, who said that he hadn’t seen her for a few days but that he did not want to report her missing as she had disappeared similarly in the past. But on August 5, Naresh officially filed a missing persons report.
Not much emerged from the police investigation for nearly three weeks. But on Thursday, August 22, the Manassas Park Police searched the Bhatt residence and arrested Naresh for “concealing a dead body”. Mamta’s body, however, has not been recovered yet. Mamta and Naresh’s one-year-old child is being cared for by the US Department of Social Services. As of writing, Naresh has only been charged with concealing a dead body. I’m unsure what that means if the body hasn’t been discovered yet. It’s also not clear if Naresh murdered Mamta and hid her body. Details are still emerging, and Manassas Park police will probably formally charge Naresh over the weekend.
There’s not much else to say about this, and there’s no point in speculating. I just thought I’d provide an update since so many seem to be following this case. It seems like Mamta was a beloved member of the Manassas Park community, and many cared about her. Hopefully, more details will emerge soon to provide some closure to her friends and family.
That’s it for this week’s round-up. Marissa Taylor’s deep dive on the Chure follows after the break below.
I need your support. KALAM Weekly is a passion project and relies on your goodwill to continue arriving in your inboxes every week. Consider becoming a paid subscriber by clicking the link below:
Those in Nepal who want to support me can do so through eSewa using the QR code below. Please do remember to mention your name so I can provide you with your paid subscription.
The deep dive: Crisis in the Chure
Image generated by Leonardo AI
by Marissa Taylor
Last week, on August 14, the Supreme Court issued a directive to the government, instructing it to draft a new law that ensures that ‘crusher’ industries operate in an environmentally sustainable manner. Crushers are a blanket term for heavy machinery utilized to harvest raw materials from rivers and hillsides, such as stones, gravel, and sand. This directive was necessary as the crusher industry has long been running rampant across the country, hollowing out entire hills and excavating entire rivers.
However, the Supreme Court has issued numerous other rulings regarding protecting the environment generally and regulating mining and excavation specifically. Despite these, there is currently no legal framework to regulate the operation and management of the crusher industry, especially in the Chure landscape, where a majority of these industries operate.
The Chure landscape is a vital yet often overlooked ecological treasure. It consists of low hills stretching 800 kilometers along the southern part of Nepal, forming a natural boundary between the Tarai plains and the more hilly regions of the country. These small hills cover about 13 percent of the country’s total area, are spread across 37 districts, and are home to approximately 5 million people. But its importance extends beyond its size. The landscape plays a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance and supporting the livelihoods of those who live beyond its borders.
These hills are also the youngest in the Himalayan ecosystem, and their topography and climate make them naturally vulnerable to landslides and soil erosion, which is why forests play such an important role here. The forests act as a natural sponge, absorbing rainfall and slowly releasing the water into rivers and groundwater systems. This process helps prevent floods during the monsoon season and ensures a steady supply of water during the dry months, supporting both agriculture and drinking water needs for millions in the southern Tarai region. This is also a region teeming with biodiversity, acting as a critical corridor for the east-west movement of wildlife such as sloth bears, leopards, and tigers.
However, rampant deforestation, excessive mining, forest fragmentation, haphazard roads, and building construction — basically, meddlesome human intervention — are destroying the Chure. Without trees to hold water and rein in soil slippage, floods and landslides have become common. Many areas in the Tarai are now grappling with major water crises despite being in the midst of the monsoon season. Taps and wells are dry, and underground aquifers have been depleted so much that even deep bore wells don’t yield water. This crisis is alarming given that the Tarai is the country's agricultural hub and its most populous region; without sufficient water for drinking and irrigation, millions are at risk.
Just ten days before the August 14 verdict, a group of demonstrators from the Tarai had marked their 100th day of demanding government action to save the Chure region and for the federal government to address the deepening water crisis back home. The group had made their way to Kathmandu on foot earlier in May, walking for 25 days from different parts of the Tarai region, covering hundreds of kilometers. They even marched to Baluwatar, where the prime minister’s office is located. But they received little attention from policymakers and returned home, tired. The water crisis in the Tarai will continue into the coming years if something isn’t done.
The current crisis in the Chure and its knock-on effect on the Tarai have been decades in the making. In the 50s and 60s, after malaria was eradicated in the Tarai, the government sanctioned resettlement programs to populate the area. Settlement programs in the mid-hills and the Tarai were part of a concerted push by the nationalist Panchayat government of king Mahendra to dilute the dominance of Madhesis and other ethnic groups in these areas and establish ‘pahadi’ dominance. These settlement programs led to a rise in population, leading to unplanned urbanization and a national push for large-scale infrastructure projects, particularly highways, tunnels, and hydropower. Much of the raw material for these construction projects was mined from the Chure’s hills and rivers. According to a report from the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Environment, mining activities alone have impacted about 33% of the Chure range over just a few decades.
With the Supreme Court now pushing for legal reforms, there is some hope that the Chure region might finally receive the attention it deserves. However, there is also a fear that the government will continue to ignore the Court’s rulings and proceed with business as usual. After all, successive governments have already done so in the past.
In 2003, a group of citizens living in the Chure area filed suit against the government, arguing that they had been deprived of their right to form a community forest user group and manage a nearby forest as a community as per the Forest Act. The Supreme Court found the decision of the Council of Ministers unconstitutional and upheld the rights of the petitioners.
This decision provided crucial ground for subsequent decisions regarding the Chure, effectively setting a precedent that the rights of citizens to their immediate environment came before the rights of the government to use that environment for the ‘national interest.’ Subsequently, in the 2010 case of Narayan Devkota v. Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers, the Court again decided that the government was only “a trustee and not the owner of natural resources to protect the environment and rights of its citizens.” The Court also ordered the government to formulate a policy to manage the use of natural resources for the public interest of all Nepalis and without any adverse effect on the environment. This decision was ignored, and no such policy was formulated.
However, in 2014, the government designated the Chure landscape as a protected ‘Chure Conservation Area’ during the tenure of then President Ram Baran Yadav. The President Chure Conservation Program, a ‘national pride project,’ was also launched with a 20-year master plan and an investment of Rs 249.72 billion. Annually, the national budget allocates at least a billion Nepali rupees for this project. However, according to this Kantipur Daily report, from the fiscal year 2014-15 to 2022-23, only Rs 14.06 billion has been spent over these nine years. The Auditor General's 61st annual report even commented that “the work done so far does not correspond to the amount spent.”
This situation is not surprising, and the reasons for the government’s ineffectiveness are pretty straightforward: these young forests are a gold mine in terms of natural resources, like timber, sand, and gravel. Powerful extractive industries are reaping immense profits, and, notably, the government remains either complicit or silent on this matter.
Former President Yadav, one of the few politicians consistently advocating for the Chure range, has accused the “crusher industry mafia” of exploiting the region. Numerous reports have also highlighted the operations of several unregistered crusher plants that operate unabashedly because they are backed by politicians who share the profit, even at the local level.
But protesting this exploitation has proven perilous. A tragic example is Dilip Mahato, a 24-year-old engineering student who was brutally murdered for his activism against illegal mining of the Aurahi riverbed in Dhanusha district in 2020. This ‘sand mafia’ has even attacked journalists for investigating them. News reports have also indicated that local governments may be colluding with the ‘sand mafia’, with some reporting that many construction company owners themselves were elected in the local-level elections of 2018.
The government’s complicity was further demonstrated in 2021 when it attempted to lift a ban on the export of mineral-based construction material, a ban that had been imposed in 2014 as a part of Yadav’s conservation program. Lifting the ban would've exacerbated the legal and illegal mining of natural resources from the Chure. This government of the day argued that the export of these construction materials “minimizes the trade deficit.” The Supreme Court, responding to a petition filed by advocate Shailendra Ambedkar, swiftly issued an interim order not to lift the ban, citing Article 30 of the Constitution, which ensures the fundamental right of citizens to a clean and healthy environment.
Time and again, however, politicians leading the government have demonstrated that profit takes precedence over environmental concerns. This is perhaps most evident in successive governments’ pursuit of the planned second international airport in Nijgadh, Bara district, which also falls in the Chure landscape. Despite massive environmental damage from the culling of millions of trees and the destruction of wildlife habitats, Nijgadh still finds its place in every government's plans and policies as a “national pride” project. More recently, a new law, the Construction Materials (Management and Regulation) Bill, currently under discussion in Parliament, aims to reopen the export of construction materials once again. If passed, this bill could counteract the Supreme Court’s recent directive by potentially allowing increased resource extraction and export.
Sadly, the primary driver of Chure's degradation remains a familiar issue: exploitative human greed. Politicians speak about conserving the Chure landscape only when seeking support from the people of the Tarai-Madhes. As long as their own interests are served, they appear indifferent to the plight of others.
And while the Supreme Court's decision is a significant legal victory for environmental conservation, this is only a starting point. Nepali governments have a history of ignoring such rulings and directives under political influence. The crusher industry, in particular, is deeply entrenched with economic and political interests.
The Chure Range is more than just a collection of hills. It's a vital part of Nepal's natural heritage, crucial for maintaining biodiversity, ensuring water security, sustaining livelihoods, and even combating climate change. Although the court's ruling sets a legal precedent, its success will ultimately depend on the government's commitment to uphold the law and the ability to resist pressure from vested interests. Will the government choose to do the right thing? Your guess is as good as mine.
That’s all for this week. I will be back next Friday, in your emails, for the next edition of KALAM Weekly.
If you enjoyed today’s newsletter, please consider sharing it with others who might enjoy weekly updates from Nepal or consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Thanks for reading KALAM Weekly! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Is not it true that Foreign Secretary Ms Sewa Lamsal transferred as Ambassador to Belgium?